<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Static Using Statement in C# 6.0	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://intellitect.com/blog/static-using-statement-in-c-6-0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://intellitect.com/blog/static-using-statement-in-c-6-0/</link>
	<description>Complex Software Development - Simplified</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2022 17:48:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Arek Bal		</title>
		<link>https://intellitect.com/blog/static-using-statement-in-c-6-0/#comment-26581</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arek Bal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 15:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intellitect.com/?p=4038#comment-26581</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://intellitect.com/blog/static-using-statement-in-c-6-0/#comment-26571&quot;&gt;Arek Bal&lt;/a&gt;.

Oh... and would that class had to be static to use that feature?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://intellitect.com/blog/static-using-statement-in-c-6-0/#comment-26571">Arek Bal</a>.</p>
<p>Oh&#8230; and would that class had to be static to use that feature?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Arek Bal		</title>
		<link>https://intellitect.com/blog/static-using-statement-in-c-6-0/#comment-26571</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arek Bal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 15:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intellitect.com/?p=4038#comment-26571</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That will be great if used wisely by programmers. Lean class with little usings and it will be power tool. 
The only problem is how to deal with conflicts. What will be the rules of resolving such conflicts, If I have method WriteLine in my code, and use System.Console. How would I have to go about it? With &quot;this&quot; over my code or System.Console.WriteLine or would I have to drop that using statement altogether in such case.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That will be great if used wisely by programmers. Lean class with little usings and it will be power tool.<br />
The only problem is how to deal with conflicts. What will be the rules of resolving such conflicts, If I have method WriteLine in my code, and use System.Console. How would I have to go about it? With &#8220;this&#8221; over my code or System.Console.WriteLine or would I have to drop that using statement altogether in such case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nicholas Petersen		</title>
		<link>https://intellitect.com/blog/static-using-statement-in-c-6-0/#comment-25511</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Petersen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2014 17:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intellitect.com/?p=4038#comment-25511</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jack be Nimble, Jack be Quick ... with C# static usings!

I cannot express how thrilled I am about this feature. I have been eagerly waiting for this expressiveness to enter the language for years, but never expected I would see the day. 

This has the potential of allowing C# to stay nimble and light in its expressiveness. I want to respect their opinions as well, but I thought the good people as represented in the comment above would keep C# held back from such nimbleness and *optional* features (just like var, if you don&#039;t like it, you don&#039;t have to use it). 

Paul: WriteLine belongs to the Console class. The expected use of such features should be about just as obvious as that, if you know *anything* about the code base at hand. The static usings will always be declared in the usings typically at the top of the .cs file. And again, once you gain almost any familiarity with a given code base, you will in almost all good usages, be almost just as familiar with the typically few (but powerful few!) static classes being used this way.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack be Nimble, Jack be Quick &#8230; with C# static usings!</p>
<p>I cannot express how thrilled I am about this feature. I have been eagerly waiting for this expressiveness to enter the language for years, but never expected I would see the day. </p>
<p>This has the potential of allowing C# to stay nimble and light in its expressiveness. I want to respect their opinions as well, but I thought the good people as represented in the comment above would keep C# held back from such nimbleness and *optional* features (just like var, if you don&#8217;t like it, you don&#8217;t have to use it). </p>
<p>Paul: WriteLine belongs to the Console class. The expected use of such features should be about just as obvious as that, if you know *anything* about the code base at hand. The static usings will always be declared in the usings typically at the top of the .cs file. And again, once you gain almost any familiarity with a given code base, you will in almost all good usages, be almost just as familiar with the typically few (but powerful few!) static classes being used this way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: VB guy		</title>
		<link>https://intellitect.com/blog/static-using-statement-in-c-6-0/#comment-24240</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VB guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 13:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intellitect.com/?p=4038#comment-24240</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Is this like what VB had for like 14 years?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this like what VB had for like 14 years?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
